29th January 2011
Ruthard Stachowske slandered and ex-clients
"Last year on the Internet articles on the therapeutic community Wilsche fraction has been published, the expression of a cyber-stalking against our institution were."
begins with this sentence an online publication of Mr Stachowske on the sides of he conducts therapeutic community Wilsche break. Is funded by the Youth Services Lüneburg. Managing Director since the beginning of the year, Ms Gisela van der Heijden, who I have already made an offer of talks.
I am currently the only one on the Internet which reports regularly on this institution, on http://familiensteller.blogspot.com/ and http://tgwilschenbruchvorgericht.blogspot.com/ also disabled for now blog http://drogenpatienten.blogspot.com/ I took over the press law responsibility.
googled you this device, you quickly end up on my pages. The charge of cyber-stalking me so true. Had I but been guilty of such crimes, there would certainly long been a corresponding response from Mr Stachowske, which is confined only to displays of legal disputes.
goes on to say in this post:
was "the background of this cyber-stalking that we family law decisions were involved in which decisions were taken against the parents' rights. The decisions were the result of serious threats to children's welfare, for example, sexual violence against children and young people or serious violence against children. Some concerned parents have connected to this family law decisions with 'stalkers' and expressed their dissatisfaction with material on the Internet. "
I have now spoken to several dozen mothers and publishing their experiences. Among them was not a single mother who is such a behavior could be blamed. The allegation that I had with children torment gutters or children torment channels had formed an alliance with me is an outrage and is likely to cause my reputation severely damaged.
continuation of the text of Mr Stachowske:
"The TG Wilsche fracture is of such a cyber-stalking is not only affected: Many social institutions, authorities and institutions dealing with human difficult situations and with a responsibility for child welfare, to see these media attacks. We have taken legal action against the authors of the cyber-stalking and won all the procedures well before the relevant authorities. The courts of our legal position and the legality of our actions have clearly confirmed and clear. "
checks in statements no court litigation-intensive the operation of a facility. In addition, Mr. Stachowske not "all procedures ... clearly won." See http://tgwilschenbruchvorgericht.blogspot.com/
"Our partners are well informed of the competent authorities in the provincial and federal politics," added Mr Stachowke.
I conclude that I was now vilified as against third parties.
"Together with our lawyer, Dr. Jochen Springer (Uelzen), we are the phenomenon of stalking in the context of child protection and addiction in a legal journal publishing. We will also reflect the phenomenon at a conference, "announced Mr. Stachowske to then.
Does this mean that I should be made publicly in the pillory?
" Our work is still important. . We work on a high professional level for the benefit of our clients and their children and will continue to protect from hazards in accordance with legal and psychological best interests of children "
this last sentence I understand linguistic reasons not
The source of the contribution.:
http://tg-wilschenbruch.de/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=131&Itemid=126 Published been
this post on 24th January 2011 also . As the person responsible is the imprint Matthias Lange. But he is no longer the manager.
30th January 2011 filed a complaint
We have just refunded on Ruthard Stachowske lawsuit and criminal complaint.
31st January 2011
warning to youth services Lüneburg
Since Ruthard Stachowske made his contribution on the part has to be the responsibility of the Youth Services Lüneburg, my lawyer Markus Kompa from Münster has sent a warning to the youth services. The deadline for signing ends on 3 February 2011th
Note: All who have been in the therapeutic community Wilsche fracture, have also the opportunity to file a claim because they are visible to friends, at least, warnings are possible..
A solidarity action
second February 2011
look at the schedule of Rolf Schälike
No one is obliged to trust me blindly. Finally, in Hamburg Rolf Schälike a process observer, who reports regularly on the proceedings before the Hamburg District Court.
In Dates stands on its website: "disposal method
01:10:10: Negotiated moved on 19:11:10, 10:45
19:11:10: Moved on 21:01:11, 10:30
21:01:11: brief period of time. Delivery of a decision on 25.03.11, 9:55, Room B335 "
This brief period has been requested by opposing counsel because the judge that the action was too lean. According to the present state it is to be rejected. Four weeks should be granted to opposing counsel Justification. The new managing director of youth services Lüneburg was sick as the bearer of the institution of Ruthard Stachowske Gisela van der Heijden has only been a few weeks in office before she was at Finneck Foundation
... The diary by Rolf Schälike
10th February 2011
injunction
The Munich District Court, we have requested a preliminary injunction. Ruthard Stachowske can process did not win because of cyber stalking, because it was not such procedures existed.
It remains a puzzle, this claim: "Together with our lawyer, Dr. Jochen Springer (Uelzen), we will publish the phenomenon of stalking in the context of child protection and addiction in a legal journal We will also reflect the phenomenon at a conference.."
In Cyberstalking it is a stalking behavior, which is a networked computer use. Should read at once the question of who has their computer to the computer of the therapeutic community networked Wilsche break?
decision of the Munich District Court
0 comments:
Post a Comment